997.2 C2 Manual on autotrader at £21k

[b2thomas]

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-de...elevance&make=PORSCHE&price-from=20000&page=2

This seems great value. I know it's high mileage but if looked after this seems a great way into gen 2 ownership.

Just posting in case anyone is looking and not seen it.

 

[T8]

This seems great value. I know it's high mileage but if looked after this seems a great way into gen 2 ownership.

:yeah:

Apart from the previous owner(s) consistently running tyres to slicks the MOT history stacks up well.

It should be snapped up very quickly - probably by a trader looking to make a quick £kfew.

 

[Alex]

Apart from the previous owner(s) consistently running tyres to slicks the MOT history stacks up well.

Where does it state that?

That's the only time the tyres were worn down below limit:

Date tested
30 June 2014
FAIL
Mileage
42,696 miles
MOT test number
2152 0128 4478
Test location
View test location
Reason(s) for failure
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)

 

[jkhamler]

Just what I'm looking for. Hoping I can reach the seller!

 

[Trantorman]

is that the latter engine or is it right on the change over?

 

[Alex]

Latter.

 

[jkhamler]

When I spoke to the vendor around midday he said he'd already had over 10 calls - I tried to offer the deposit then and there but he said he wanted to send some service information over from the garage by email. I awaited the email eagerly which never arrived and now the listing is gone. :sad:

 

[Trantorman]

somebody got a great deal on that then.

lets hope its private and not a trader who will put it at £27,995

 

[Zingari]

When I spoke to the vendor around midday he said he'd already had over 10 calls - I tried to offer the deposit then and there but he said he wanted to send some service information over from the garage by email. I awaited the email eagerly which never arrived and now the listing is gone. :sad:

Sounds sus to me :bandit:

 

[T8]

Apart from the previous owner(s) consistently running tyres to slicks the MOT history stacks up well.

Where does it state that?

That's the only time the tyres were worn down below limit:

Date tested
30 June 2014
FAIL
Mileage
42,696 miles
MOT test number
2152 0128 4478
Test location
View test location
Reason(s) for failure
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)

And advisories in 2012, 2018 and 2019 but, as we don't know when they were actually replaced, my reference to 'slicks' may not have been an overstatement. :wink:

 

[spongebob squarepants]

It's a scam, not sure what's to be gained but I'm sure someone does.

 

[Alex]

Apart from the previous owner(s) consistently running tyres to slicks the MOT history stacks up well.

Where does it state that?

That's the only time the tyres were worn down below limit:

Date tested
30 June 2014
FAIL
Mileage
42,696 miles
MOT test number
2152 0128 4478
Test location
View test location
Reason(s) for failure
Nearside Rear Tyre tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (4.1.E.1)

And advisories in 2012, 2018 and 2019 but, as we don't know when they were actually replaced, my reference to 'slicks' may not have been an overstatement. :wink:

Slicks?

Date tested
11 July 2012
PASS
Mileage
19,670 miles
MOT test number
6658 1319 2113
Test location
View test location
Expiry date
10 July 2013
Advisory notice item(s)
front tyres wearing slightly on inside edges
Under-trays fitted obscuring some underside components

Date tested
2 July 2018
PASS
View test certificate
Mileage
85,179 miles
MOT test number
8958 9685 0219
Test location
View test location
Expiry date
10 July 2019
Monitor and repair if necessary (advisories):
Both rear tyres wearing low 265/40/zr18 Michelin

Date tested
24 June 2019
FAIL
View test certificate
Mileage
93,585 miles
MOT test number
9363 9606 5782
Test location
View test location
Repair immediately (major defects):
Nearside Front Tyre has a cut in excess of the requirements deep enough to reach the ply or cords 235/40/Zr18 (5.2.3 (d) (i))
Monitor and repair if necessary (advisories):
Offside Front tyre perished


:?:

Apart from a cut in one tyre (not a bald tyre) there's nothing there to suggest anything other than normal wear and tyre of tyres and are perfectly legal.

 

[ChrisS80]

Maybe the seller mistakenly started the price with a 2 instead of a 3, as others have said sounds too good to be true

 

[Alex]

Might be the wifes car and theyre divorcing. :grin:

 

[LeopoldStotch]

File under "too good to be true".