Porsche 911 UK Enthusiasts Online Community Discussion Forum GB

Welcome to the @Porsche911UK website. Register a free account today to become a member! Sign up is quick and easy, then you can view, participate in topics and posts across the site that covers all things Porsche.

Already registered and looking to recovery your account, select 'login in' and then the 'forget your password' option.

How Porsche took hedge funders to the cleaners

Porsche News

Moderator
Joined
8 Feb 2008
Messages
7,361
The geniuses at Porsche have just done what half the civilised world has been thinking of doing these past few weeks and stuffed it to hedge funds and banks. The numbers are still all over the place as people try to unravel the great Stuttgart Sting. But what appears to have happened is this.

Porsche had been itching to buy Volkswagen for years. But it was struggling to raise the money. So instead of getting a traditional bank loan or issuing equity, it decided to pick the pockets of British and American hedge funds, the very funds, in fact, which have belittled stodgy old German enterprise and called it out of date. The funds which one leading German politician called "locusts" for preying on businesses while adding no value.

These funds thought VW was overpriced and reckoned Porsche was insane trying to buy it. It was nothing but a quixotic fantasy of Ferdinand Piech, the grandson of Porsche's founder and a former chief executive of VW. Porsche, after all, had annual revenues of just £5.2bn to VW's £83bn. Its market cap was around a third of its takeover target.

But Piech's intimate knowledge of VW had allowed Porsche to make enormous profits trading options on VW stock. What occurred over the weekend was the climax of this strategy. Hedge funds such as SAC and Greenlight in the US and Odey and Marshall Wace in London were eagerly shorting VW stock; borrowing, selling it and promising to return it later. They reckoned the stock price would fall and they could buy it back cheaply and pocket the difference.

What Porsche appears to have known, however, is that the volume of available shares was quickly dwindling. They knew this because they had been quietly building their own position in VW, through shares and derivatives, to 74 per cent of the firm. A further 20 per cent was owned by the government of Lower Saxony, and another five per cent owned by index tracking funds, leaving a tiny number of shares floating freely on the market.

It is conceivable that Porsche and its banks were the ones lending the hedge funds the shares and then buying them back through proxies. So while the hedge funds thought there was a large and liquid market in VW shares, Porsche knew otherwise.

On Sunday afternoon, Porsche played its hand. It announced that it controlled 74.1 per cent of VW. German law had not required it to disclose this information beforehand. The hedge funds did their calculations and freaked out. They had borrowed 15 per cent of VW and now it turned out Porsche may have lent them most of that.

They immediately began scrambling for what little stock was out there to close out their short position. Some were reported to be sobbing on the phone to their brokers. Too many traders chasing too little stock sent the price of VW soaring, pushing the company at one point on Monday past Exxon to make it the most valuable in the world. All Porsche needed to do at this point was sit back and smile. It had made billions in paper profits.

'The chaos around VW overwhelmingly hit professional gamblers. Sympathy does not seem appropriate'

Then came the reckoning. On Wednesday Porsche announced it would release five per cent of VW's stock to ease pressure on the short sellers. The share price of VW is still around two-and-a-half times where it was last week and Porsche could make around £5bn on this portion of its manoeuvre alone.

But even better, Porsche owned cash-settlement call options on 31.5 per cent of VW which, according to the New York Times, matured yesterday. If true, this earned them the difference in cash between 31.5 per cent of VW valued around last Friday's closing price of 210 Euros per share and yesterday's price of 517 Euros, an astonishing return. When VW's price returns to normal, Porsche should have more than enough cash to buy control.

Germany seems to be on Porsche's side in all this. Die Tageszeitung, a liberal newspaper, wrote on Wednesday: "As opposed to previous speculative bubbles that cost a lot of small investors their money in the stock exchange casino, the chaos around VW shares overwhelmingly hits professional gamblers. Sympathy does not seem appropriate."
 

Attachments

  • hedge_603.jpg
    hedge_603.jpg
    21.4 KB · Views: 5,700
Porsche intentions baffle markets

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/77a6dd08-a621-11dd-9d26-000077b07658.html

When Porsche speaks the market moves. A statement on Sunday brought a quadrupling of Volkswagen's shares and another early yesterday morning brought a near-halving from that elevated level. But to what end?

Almost nobody is certain what Porsche's intentions are. Its overall strategic aim remains, however, clear: to gain control of VW, Europe's largest carmaker.

Its announcement on Sunday that it held 42.6 per cent in VW directly and 31.5 per cent indirectly through options was meant to highlight how close it was to its goal. At 75 per cent - only 0.9 per cent away - it can implement a domination agreement and get its hands on VW's large cash flows.

But Porsche's use of derivatives has long had criticisms from investors and analysts who worried that its options trading could get out of control. When it disclosed a year ago that it made three times as much money from VW options - €3.6bn ($4.6bn) - as from making cars, an analyst at Sanford Bernstein described Porsche's finance director as "more of an options trader than a CFO" and added "investors would prefer him to be the latter not the former".

Even before VW, Porsche had made vast profits from options, this time in currency hedging, which led to annual profits of €250m.

That growing dependency on derivatives has led many hedge funds, burned by the huge rise in VW's share price, to speculate wildly that Porsche was forced to put out the statement at the weekend to ensure its financial health. In particular, hedge funds claim it may have been exposed to big options positions.

Porsche refutes the allegations vehemently. Frank Gaube, its head of investor relations, said: "We have not manipulated the market. To say we released a statement because of option positions refers to share price manipulation and we refute it totally."

He says that Porsche put out its weekend release to show investors that there was a free float of only 5.8 per cent, rather than the 45 per cent some had been assuming. "What we wanted to say at the weekend is that one should expect that the banks with which we have these cash-settled options normally cover themselves by buying the shares and that the market should realise the free float was lower than it thought," he adds.

He similarly dismisses arguments that Porsche had run into trouble on its currency hedging. It is fully hedged against the dollar until 2013 and has argued in the past that the US currency could go as high as $1.80. The current level of about $1.25 has led some to believe Porsche could now be in difficulty. But Mr Gaube says Porsche does not hold just one option but layers of options that fall away gradually if the dollar strengthens. He adds it could cost them some money but not much. A €10bn credit line that it drew down earlier this year is "needed for VW" and is not invested in options, says Mr Gaube.

More mystery surrounds yesterday's announcement that it could settle up to 5 per cent in hedging transactions to support liquidity in VW shares. Mr Gaube says Porsche has only settled "substantially below 1 per cent" and hopes to remain under 5 per cent. He is unclear as to how Porsche will decide how many options to close but says it regards a share price of even €300 as "unreasonable".

What is left is huge paper gains for Porsche: on the 31 per cent where it has disclosed how much it paid for VW shares it has made €42bn at yesterday's close on an investment of €5.8bn; for the further 11 per cent in equity analysts estimate it could be at least €10bn.

What remains is the strategic rationale for buying into VW, which was to ensure Porsche's relationship with its biggest supplier stays intact.
 
Porsche now needs to concentrate on making cars

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6c7ce270-a620-11dd-9d26-000077b07658.html

After doubling its stake in Volkswagen, Porsche yesterday doubled the free float of VW's shares - albeit to a still measly 10 per cent. It said it was selling 5 per cent of VW to avoid "further market distortions" that had sent VW's shares to irrational levels and threatened the survival of some hedge funds.

Was Porsche told to do so or did the German sports car manufacturer decide off its own bat to make a gesture to show that, after all, it is not the villain of the piece? The answer is neither here or there. Of course, Porsche's blitz on VW raises all sorts of important issues, including the role of Germany's financial watchdog, the need to regulate cash-settled options and so on.

But two things at least are clear. Porsche has completed the transformation of VW from a state-controlled company - even though the state of Lower Saxony still owns a 21 per cent stake and a blocking minority in the company - into a family-controlled one. As everybody knows, one of the traditional values of family companies - and there are a good number of them in the automobile industry - is to look after "number one" as many minority investors in listed family concerns have discovered at their expense.

The second thing is that Porsche has proven itself on several occasions much smarter than the smartest guys in the room to paraphrase the title of the Hollywood production of the Enron scandal a couple of years ago. From all accounts, Porsche has been making lots of money behaving like a hedge fund and is likely to make even more money out of its latest dealings.

So hats off for financial wizardry, and the Germans should be the first to applaud how a local champion has successfully outwitted the very locusts - as some Germans like to call hedge funds and activist investors - that have provoked so much corporate and political Sturm und Drang across the Rhine. While nobody doubts Porsche's car manufacturing skills as well as its talent in making money, the big question is whether the sports carmaker will now devote less attention on financial matters and far more on turning its VW merger into an industrial success.

The group needs to shift back from finance to the traditional business of cars. The industry is in a huge mess and neither Porsche nor VW are likely to escape. The car sector is being hit from two sides. It is always one of the first industries to suffer from a credit squeeze, especially as the majority of cars are sold these days with financing packages. And a sword of Damocles is being brandished over its head in the form of draconian new proposals to cut CO 2 emissions forcing all manufacturers to develop more ecologically friendly vehicles and invest in next-generation electric cars. VW may have taken some comfort so far as resisting better than most the current downturn. But many analysts are now suggesting that VW could end up being hit harder than most next year, given that it does not rely simply on smaller more recession-proof vehicles but also on a whole range of larger cars, including high-end market products with its Audi brand. As for Porsche, life for luxury sports car manufacturers is already difficult, especially in the US market. The pressure is likely to be all the greater for Porsche to adapt to new energy saving and environmental standards.

Porsche's deft financial footwork could also backfire. In the past the Stuttgart sports car group has boasted it has never had to use or claim for subsidies, even when building a new plant. This may no longer be the case now that it is absorbing VW. And it would be odd if it did not add its voice to the chorus of European car manufacturers calling on Brussels and their governments to support the industry. The carmakers are lobbying for a €40bn ($51.5bn) funding package to help them cope with the dire situation. In Porsche's case, the authorities could well be tempted to reject any demands for support. After all, they would be perfectly entitled to claim that Porsche has no need for such help, given their track record as financial players.

Bankers' restraint

The international banking community is anxious to improve its current ghastly public image. It has just decided to cancel the gala dinner that normally marks the end of next month's annual Frankfurt European Banking Congress - a grand event that has gathered all the great and the good of the world of finance and politics for the past 15 years. Given the current crisis and the need for the banking industry to show a little restraint after the excess of past years, it was generally felt that holding the lavish gala dinner this year would not be in the best of taste. The bankers and policymakers clearly did not want to provoke a similar outcry as Fortis and Dexia, which recently hosted extravagant dinners in Monte Carlo only days after being rescued by their governments.
 

Attachments

  • vw_283.jpg
    vw_283.jpg
    24.3 KB · Views: 5,695
Porsche hedged their bets – and got VW

You work hard, spend too many hours on the factory floor or at your desk, and earn just enough to pay the bills.

But someone you've never met, someone who doesn't want to know your name, may be gambling that your business will struggle or fail.

They win, if your business loses.

This is the world of the hedge fund and short-seller: the new bogeymen of the world financial system.

The notion that someone can make money by betting that a company or economy will struggle is, to say the least, unpalatable - immoral, some might say.

So you could be forgiven a wry smile about the news that hedge funds may lose about £13bn - and that some may go bust - after their bet that the share price of carmaker Volkswagen would go down went badly wrong.

The short-sellers were trumped by another carmaker, Porsche, which swooped on a 75pc stake in VW and sparked a surge in demand for the carmaker's shares - pushing the price up rather than down.

But before we celebrate the hedge funds' misfortune, it is worth bearing in mind they served a purpose in the past.

Hedge funds first emerged in era of volatile exchange rates and oil prices in the 1970s and early 1980s.

They proved a useful way for companies to reduce the risk of having to pay more for raw materials in future, or to reduce the risk that currency rises and falls would dent the profits they made from exporting and importing.

Airlines, for example, "hedge" the price of aviation fuel by agreeing what they will pay months in advance - rather than see their costs change dramatically as the price of crude oil fluctuates on world markets from day to day.

But come the early 1990s and hedge funds had evolved into more complex financial beasts.

Short-selling first came to prominence in the UK in the Exchange Rate Mechanism (ERM) crisis of 1992 when traders - most famously George Soros - made fortunes by betting that the price of the pound would fall.

They gambled, successfully, that the British government wouldn't be able keep to sterling within agreed exchange rate limits against the German mark - no matter how high then chancellor Norman Lamont raised interest rates (to 15pc) or how many billions the government spent trying to prop up the currency.

Today, the theory behind short-selling is simple enough.

A trader borrows shares from a long term investor, like a pension fund.

The trader then sells the borrowed shares in the hope the price will fall.

Once the shares have dropped, the trader buys back the same number of shares at the lower price and returns them to the original owner.

The trader pockets the difference between the high selling price and low buying price.

What is in it for the long-term investor?

The hedge fund pays the long-term investor a "rental fee" for borrowing the shares. So the long-term investor earns some extra money with no effort, the trader banks a profit.

Nothing wrong with that.

Shares are only pieces of paper, right?

Well, no.

Short-selling is betting that capital will leak out of real companies.

In the days before the multi-billion pound bail-out of the banks by the British government, for example, the share price of some banks fell so low that their future was in real doubt.

The City regulator, the Financial Services Authority, imposed a ban on short-selling of bank shares.

Worse still, if markets do fall, the value of your pension pot or endowment mortgage is eroded - you are worse off.

In the case of Volkswagen, the short-sellers believed carmakers were a safe bet for share price falls.

Some of the industry's biggest names have struggled in recent weeks, and there has even been talk of a merger between American giants Chrysler and General Motors.

VW's share price was pushed down to e200 on the European markets on Friday night. Then on Sunday, Porsche announced that it gobbled up about 75pc of VW shares and that the state of Saxony had bought a further 20pc - leaving the short-sellers fighting to buy-back some of the remaining 5pc to return what they had borrowed.

The surge in demand for VW shares pushed the carmaker's price to €1,005 on Tuesday - briefly making it the biggest company in the world.

So will this costly lesson for the hedge funds mark a new era for the financial system?

Will it mark the end of the short-seller?

Probably not.

But you won't see quite as many City traders driving around in a Porsche.
 

Attachments

  • 1662_377.jpg
    1662_377.jpg
    13.1 KB · Views: 5,692
VW shares halve as Porsche eases short squeeze

Shares in carmaker Volkswagen nearly halved on Wednesday after controlling shareholder Porsche took steps to ease a squeeze on shortsellers who more than quadrupled the price of the stock in days.

Porsche itself prompted the meteoric rise in VW stock with its announcement on Sunday that it had effective control of 74.1 percent of VW, leaving less than 6 percent tradeable in the market.

Hedge fund manager David Einhorn's Greenlight Capital suffered heavy losses from a VW trade as a result, people familiar with his portfolio said on Tuesday.

"In order to avoid further market distortions and the resulting consequences for those involved, Porsche SE intends... to settle hedging transactions in the amount of up to 5 percent of the Volkswagen ordinary shares," Porsche said in a statement.

The stampede to cover open short positions after Sunday's announcement vaulted VW's market value to 278 billion euros ($348 billion) and its shares to a record close of 945 euros on Tuesday.

Investors cried foul, and German securities watchdog BaFin said it would take a closer look at Porsche's dealings for signs of insider trading and market manipulation, but the company said again on Wednesday it had done nothing wrong.

Analysts at Commerzbank and Merck Finck estimated Porsche's strike price on its cash-settled hedges were around 100 euros per share, meaning Porsche could make 5.9 billion euros from selling 5 percent of its call options at a price of 500 euros.

Although it stands to gain more than the value of all of its listed preferred shares put together, a Porsche spokesman denied speculation it wanted to "cash in" with the deal.

Nevertheless analysts believe Porsche can raise its direct stake in VW of 42.6 percent to 75 percent in part through the windfall profits the short squeeze offers.

Once there, Porsche plans to submit VW to a domination agreement, granting it full control over such prize assets as Audi (NSUG.DE: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz).

Volkswagen's premium brand underlined its importance to the group, bucking the sector trend for declining earnings and boosting operating profit by almost 14 percent to 2 billion euros in the first nine months.

Shortsellers who rushed to close their positions after Porsche's announcement on Sunday were paying virtually any price to get their hands on the few remaining shares, even though Porsche insisted its announcement would allow short sellers to unwind their positions "without haste and without greater risk."

So far no hedge fund or banks have publicly acknowledged being on the losing side of the short squeeze.

"Clearly there has been a colossal amount of money lost," said a London hedge fund manger who invests in Germany but did not wager on the Volkswagen-Porsche play.

"There is obviously severe pain out there."

CLAMPDOWN

The billions that could have been lost raise the questions over whether disclosure rules should also apply not just to plain vanilla stock options but cash-settled ones as well.

"The VW situation highlights the need for a consistent approach to contracts for difference disclosure across Europe," said Andrew Shrimpton, a member of Kinetic Partners and the former head of hedge fund supervision at Britain's Financial Services Authority.

"If the UK FSA brings in requirements to stop secret stakes being acquired under the radar then the same approach should be applied in the rest of the continent."

German hedge fund association BAI admitted some funds might have been damaged by the squeeze, but that was inevitable in a market economy and an inevitable consolidation among the world's 10,000 was healthy.

Aleksander Kluzniak, its chief lobbyist, said he saw no need for a regulatory clampdown on derivatives, such as a registry of hedging positions, just because the market was surprised by creeping takeovers like Porsche-VW and Schaeffler-Continental (CONG.DE: Quote, Profile, Research, Stock Buzz), which were facilitated by building up clandestine positions in cash settled options.

"I doubt it would lead to the required results. New types of derivatives or trading techniques would emerge that were not subject to this regulation," Kluzniak explained.

VW WEIGHTING CUT

Only 24 hours after peaking as the world's biggest company by market value, VW stock fell on Wednesday as low as 491 euros as the market exhaled in relief that Porsche was releasing a part of its hedge and alleviating the worst of the squeeze.

Wednesday's retreat kept Germany's blue-chip DAX index .GDAXI in check despite double-digit rises on other stocks after Wall Street clocked up its second best day's gain on Tuesday.

Closing down 45 percent at 517 euros, VW's fall shaved off nearly 600 points from the index on Wednesday, meaning the DAX would otherwise have closed up 12 percent.

Deutsche Boerse operator of the Frankfurt exchange, said late on Tuesday it would cut the weighting of Volkswagen shares in the DAX to 10 percent from Monday after VW's leap had distorted the index.

Index provider Stoxx Ltd also said it would cut the weighting of Volkswagen shares in its main indexes and cut Volkswagen's free float factor to 0.3732 from 0.4963.

Volkswagen shares touched 1,000 euros at one point, pushing its weighting in the 30 member-DAX index to 27 percent.
 

Attachments

  • vw_107.jpg
    vw_107.jpg
    17.6 KB · Views: 5,687
Porsche is a hedge fund which also makes nice cars. :D
 

Latest posts

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
124,586
Messages
1,441,754
Members
49,011
Latest member
Mchass
Back
Top