What's new
Porsche 911 UK Enthusiasts Online Community Discussion Forum GB

Welcome to the @Porsche911UK website. Register a free account today to become a member! Sign up is quick and easy, then you can view, participate in topics and posts across the site that covers all things Porsche.

Already registered and looking to recovery your account, select 'login in' and then the 'forget your password' option.

Used Porsche and Prestige Cars For Sale | Harbour Cars

996 RMS SEAL

N

Nej123

New member
Joined
20 Jan 2020
Messages
4
Hi, I have just put a deposit on my first Porsche :D but am suffering from IMS FAILURE SYNDROME!! Its a 2003 996 Targa - 53000 miles with a full (mainly Porsche) service history. I noticed that there was an oil leak and part of the deal is that the seller gets the oil leak fixed at the sellers cost. It is currently in TWG Porsche in Peterborough they have said it is the RMS Seal. My dilemma - should I get the IMS done while the gear box is out? Its Tiptronic so I would hope the box will not come out very often. They have quoted and extra £1100.00 to fit the IMS which seems a lot as the box is already out and I would have to pay for the IMS work. Any advice / comments would be really helpful.

Is it possible to fully inspect the IMS in situ?
 
http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=137633

6th post down is relevant .

It sounds a little overpriced as the engine is already dropped but depending on the type used a replacement part is £500 on its own .

Should you change it :?: .. thats down to you .. if your going to worry about it every time you drive the car then yes .

As per above though it can be checked in situ and if ok then you don't have to replace it .

There is no way to fully inspect it as such as that would mean cutting it apart .

As it's a Targa then i would be more concerned about the roof .. engine running and it should move back and forth easily .. if very very slow or you have to help it close then its cable time .


http://911uk.com/viewtopic.php?t=116450
 
The only 'correct' way to replace an IMS bearing is by stripping the engine. Yanking it out and pressing a new one in in situ can cause further problems down the line. There is no factual evidence that any of these 'improvements' are any more reliable than what you already have in.

If you want to do anything to ease your mind, get the garage to inspect the bearing for any play and whilst they're in there, remove the outer dust shield off the bearing so that in the future it is constantly lubricated by the engine's oil.

:thumbs:
 
Alex said:
The only 'correct' way to replace an IMS bearing is by stripping the engine. Yanking it out and pressing a new one in in situ can cause further problems down the line. There is no factual evidence that any of these 'improvements' are any more reliable than what you already have in.

If you want to do anything to ease your mind, get the garage to inspect the bearing for any play and whilst they're in there, remove the outer dust shield off the bearing so that in the future it is constantly lubricated by the engine's oil.

:thumbs:
Click to expand...

There's no reason for an IMS bearing replacement to damage anything as long as they don't hit so hard it damages the oil pump on the other side of engine. Or damage the plastic chain tensioners.

The original bearing is under specced that's a fact, it cannot deal with the chain whip loads, nor does it have thick enough exterior outer race to avoid deformation on some tighter clearanced IMS tubes (hence some earlier failures sub 40k). Also the reason why the later M97 bigger bearings hardly ever fail.

Its been clearly identified as a service item, just change it with a competent garage there are some great options out there such as the replacement bearing sold by Eporsch in Bisley which is very similar to the EPS Eternal Solution just without the oiling mod to the oil pump key. This about £370 Inc VAT and not the huge cost of the LN Engineering bearings which are just absurd to be honest. There are even cheaper ways to do it but that's just a bit too ghetto. In reality it's just a ball bearing.

Some people on here are in denial about this issue and the faster you fix it the better you will sleep at night, knowing that your £16k engine won't blow up whilst you are out buying some milk.

My only caveat being if you have a 2.5L Boxster, it just doesn't make sense financially to do it, when you can get a wrecker engine for 2k if you're unlucky enough to blow it.

And the first person to suggest Porsche aren't stupid enough to make a bearing under specced, can I refer you to the following faults.

964 oil leaks
997 bore scoring
991 cylinder seizure
3.8L GT3 engine fires
GT3 engines blowing up on track (due to knocking).

Is the 911 amazing? Yeah sure as hell it is, but don't kid yourself it's beyond reproach, also don't kid yourself they're cheap to run either. They will always kick you in the balls when you least expect it. It's just being prepared and have the monies waiting.
 
Sounds very expensive and unfair... the garage should pay the labour charge they'd have payed for the RMS change under your agreement then allow you to pay the difference for the upgrade bearing which would be parts and a bit of extra labour.
 
Thanks everyone for your comments - very helpful. I think it makes sense to replace the IMS as the gearbox is already out. It will give me peace of mind and add value if / when I come to sell the car.

Talk about the cost of Porsche ownership - its cost me £1100.00 and I don't even own it yet!! :eek:
 
Don't think it will add value to your car. It would put some members on here (self included) off buying the car if the bearing had been replaced in situ with an aftermarket alternative.

Ps. 3.6 996 was around 8% failure rate of low mileage cars due to manufacturing tolerances causing bearings to prematurely fail on some.
 
There's some excellent posts on here from Ba Hart at Hartech on recommendations on what to due. I'd suggest you search for some of those and have a good read.
 
Alex said:
Don't think it will add value to your car. It would put some members on here (self included) off buying the car if the bearing had been replaced in situ with an aftermarket alternative.

Ps. If the bearing was under specified, they'd have all failed. 3.6 996 was around 8% of low mileage cars due to manufacturing tolerances causing bearings to prematurely fail on some.
Click to expand...

The problem is that potential buyers who've read the buyers guides will always ask whether 'IMS has been done' so I might be inclined to invest some cash if I was selling as there are buyers out there, rightly or wrongly, who'd rule a car out if the IMS had not been 'upgraded'.
 
Alex said:
Don't think it will add value to your car. It would put some members on here (self included) off buying the car if the bearing had been replaced in situ with an aftermarket alternative.

Ps. 3.6 996 was around 8% failure rate of low mileage cars due to manufacturing tolerances causing bearings to prematurely fail on some.
Click to expand...

The single row actually has a higher load capacity than the dual row, my opinion regarding their failure is the lack of thrust handling capacity during heavy loads scenarios.

Either way the only thing certain with anything mechanical is it will eventually fail. If you're going to put your trust in a 15 to 22 year old bearing that is under specified, in a hot oil environment with poor lubrication and the possibility of rancid oil trapped behind it that can be replaced for 1/8 the cost of the engine you're mad.
 
Out of interest, have you had a borescope done as the 3.6 engine (especially with tiptronic box) has a far higher risk of having scored bores than an issue with the ims bearing.
 
Alex said:
Out of interest, have you had a borescope done as the 3.6 engine (especially with tiptronic box) has a far higher risk of having scored bores than an issue with the ims bearing.
Click to expand...

He's right you know.. I'd have that checked.
 
Whether it is expensive depends on the deal that you've done, and whether any other work is being done. When I bought my 996.1 C2 cab (72kmiles) I paid £1k to get the IMS and RMS done whilst the engine was out for a leaky oil separator replacement. There was no indication that either was an issue, and no history to say they had been done so from my standpoint it was peace of mind. If the RMS is being done as part of the sale £1100 seams a bit steep.
 
996 Targs 2003

Well - I bit the bullitt and had the IMS replaced while the gearbox was out - £800.00 so I think that was a good deal.

This is my first Porche so driving back last Friday after picking up the car was a real pleasure - very happy with the purchase - but>>>>>>>>>

Suddenly the radio goes off "No PTY"? leaving just a hiss. Later that evening sat in the car checking everything out (like you do) I reset the radio (factory settings) and retuned it - worked perfectly until I started the car - suddenly no reception and "No PTY" signal. Similar issue the next dat - seems a bit random?

I have ready several forums about this but there does not seem to be a clear answer to the problem - has anyone got a solution. Also date is stuck in the year 2000?
 
Date issue is non-resolvable I think... something to do with GPS signal or somesuch. Think of it as adding to the retro experience.

IMS bearing sounds a good call, best to bite the bullet as you say. Enjoy the car!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Haalex
996.1 engine woes
2
Replies
26
Views
3K
ATM ATM
A
L
No tip, no problem?
Replies
8
Views
663
Zingari
Zingari
S
IMS seal leak = engine rebuild?
Replies
9
Views
2K
YPVS
Y
T
Confusing Oil Pressure Problem
2
Replies
18
Views
2K
bananaz
B
D
Wanted 996 Carrera 4 S / 997 Carrera S
Replies
4
Views
593
dpg123
D
M84
911 996 Ownership Update
2 3 4 5
Replies
64
Views
5K
Alex
Alex
T
996 RMS Seal - what other works should I do...
Replies
9
Views
2K
toddy2
T
Porsche engine conversion and repair specialist

Latest posts

New Threads

Porsche Model Range

Porsche 911

Porsche 992: 2018- Porsche 992: 2018- Porsche 991: 2011-2019 Porsche 991: 2011-2019 Porsche 997: 2004-2012 Porsche 997: 2004-2012 Porsche 996: 1997-2005 Porsche 996: 1997-2005 Porsche 993: 1993-1998 Porsche 993: 1993-1998 Porsche 964: 1989-1993 Porsche 964: 1989-1993 Porsche Carrera 3.2: 1983-1989 Porsche Carrera 3.2: 1983-1989 Porsche Carrera SC: 1977-1983 Porsche Carrera SC: 1977-1983 Porsche 930 Turbo: 1975-1989 Porsche 930 Turbo: 1975-1989 Porsche Early 911: 1964-1977 Porsche Early 911: 1964-1977

Porsche Hypercars

Porsche 918 Spyder Porsche 918 Spyder Porsche Carrera GT Porsche Carrera GT Porsche GT1 Porsche GT1 Porsche 959 Porsche 959

Other Current Porsche Model

Porsche Taycan : (2019-0%) Porsche Taycan : (2019-0%) Porsche Macan : 2013- Porsche Macan : 2013- Porsche Panamera : 2009- Porsche Panamera : 2009- Porsche Cayman: 2005- Porsche Cayman: 2005- Porsche Cayenne: 2003- Porsche Cayenne: 2003- Porsche Boxster: 1997- Porsche Boxster: 1997-

Porsche Legacy Models

Porsche 928 Porsche 928 Porsche 968 Porsche 968 Porsche 944 Porsche 944 Porsche 924 Porsche 924 Porsche 914 Porsche 914 Porsche 912 Porsche 912 Porsche 904 Porsche 904 Porsche 550 Porsche 550 Porsche 356 Speedster Porsche 356 Speedster Porsche 356 Porsche 356

Forum statistics

Threads
124,562
Messages
1,441,538
Members
48,977
Latest member
GT3161

porsche insurance porsche parts porsche sales porsche car sales porsche for sale
porsche classic sales porsche tuning porsche sold porsche specialist porsche engine rebuilds porsche driver training porsche car sales porsche exhausts

Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2024 XenForo Ltd. XenForo theme by xenfocus

www.911uk.com @Porsche911UK THE DEFINITIVE PORSCHE FORUM Copyright © 911UK 2002-2024 All rights reserved.

911uk.com is not associated and is wholly independent of Porsche Automobil Holdings SE, Dr. Ing.h.c.F.Porsche AG, Porsche Cars GB, its subsidiaries and offical Porsche centres. Any word, phrase or graphic that in any way resembles anything to do with the Porsche name or organisation are registered trademarks of Porsche Automobil Holdings SE and Dr. Ing.h.c.F. Porsche AG.

Back
Top