Porsche 911 UK Enthusiasts Online Community Discussion Forum GB

Welcome to the @Porsche911UK website. Register a free account today to become a member! Sign up is quick and easy, then you can view, participate in topics and posts across the site that covers all things Porsche.

Already registered and looking to recovery your account, select 'login in' and then the 'forget your password' option.

Data help needed with Eco-Power project

bazhart

Barcelona
Joined
20 May 2009
Messages
1,343
Our ECO-POWER project has moved further ahead than we ever imagined – uncovering all sorts of fascinating facts and discoveries that throw a whole new light on how to make our engines perform better with greater economy and lower emissions – but as we learn more we realise it would have helped to start out slightly differently.

We should have conducted more data tests on standard road cars before then moving on into our Eco engine versions and now not only have various other models of capacity conversion under test, but also two 996 ECO-Engine'd cars (one manual and one tip) that we are testing and gathering data on.

There is a limit to how many cars we can apply to this and how much time we can spend just driving them around for data acquisition – so it would be a big help if some of you could post on here the following for standard 996 3.4's or Hartech 3.7's.

The reason is that we have found that gearing has a major influence on economy and emissions and the chosen gear seems to change and depend on the torque characteristics of the engine as much as the preferences of the driver – so is a major factor in power band development.

(1) We are only interested in results at constant speed – i.e. 30, 40, 50 ,60 and 70 mph (usually in traffic) and would like to know which gear (manual or tip) you are most often driving in when at the above constant speeds.
(2) We don't need multiple answers saying sometimes this gear or sometimes that gear - but just need the gear you most often use at those speeds.
(3) Secondly (if it is not too difficult) which gear you usually drop down to when accelerating from those same speeds (or the same gear you usually stay in).
(4) The answers to Q 1 can be posted for example – like this Manual (or Tip) 30 – 4th, 40 4th, 50 5th, 60 5th, 70 6th.
(5) Q2 the change down (if used) when accelerating - could be (Manual or tip) 30 – 4th to 3rd, 40 – 4th to stay in 4th, 50 – 5th to 4th, 60 – stay in 6th or down to 5th.
(6) Please don't copy these figures I am interested in your own.

Finally a very happy New Year to all.

Many thanks guys, Baz
 
Standard 3.4 Manual

30 - 3rd
40 - 5th
50 - 6th
60 - 6th
70 - 6th

Need more detail for the 2nd question when you say accelerate. If I'm going to overtake I usually put it in the lowest possible gear, 1 for safety reasons, 2 to make a lot of noise and drama.

Maybe state soft acceleration and hard acceleration. The 2 are completely different scenarios for me.
 
Thanks for the 2 replies so far - actually fits in with what we expected but nice to have it independently confirmed and is actually a lot more significant than most might realise.

For reasons that we will make fully public soon - one of the most surprising results that has come out of our research and testing is that the ECO-POWER engines (both different builds but using the same principle) result in drivers generally selecting higher gears for the same speeds and remaining in the same gear (or changing down less far) for overtaking and this makes a huge difference to the overall economy and emissions.

The reason this is so significant is that it would not show up in like for like tests on dynos or scheduled road tests following pre-selected test criteria because it introduces something difficult to define - how an engine "feels" and what it "feels" like would be best to change gear into for overtaking.

That "driver feel and choice" alters the overall benefits of very different economy in different gears and turned out to be one of two significant reasons why our capacity conversions resulted in independently reported general improvements in economy as well as performance (the other being improved thermal efficiency).

More results still invited please - thanks

Baz
 

Latest posts

New Threads

Forum statistics

Threads
124,625
Messages
1,442,222
Members
49,062
Latest member
white981gt4
Back
Top